<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suicide reporting, responsibility and Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bettylovesblogging.com/suicide-reporting-responsibility-and-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bettylovesblogging.com/suicide-reporting-responsibility-and-twitter/</link>
	<description>travel writings, rambles, meals and photography by australian ashlee betteridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:25:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unspun</title>
		<link>http://www.bettylovesblogging.com/suicide-reporting-responsibility-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Unspun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bettylovesblogging.com/?p=571#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link. The trouble with social media is that everybody can become a publisher at a very low cost of entry - a mobile with data access - and most people do not have the grounding in journalistic principles of factual accuracy, sensibility and taste. I think the only viable solution is for the more established Tweeps to influence the Twittersphere to be more discretionary. Everything else - code of ethics, guidelines etc - will either fall on deaf ears to the social media masses and therefore - as you pointed out - unenforceable. Like your blog BTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. The trouble with social media is that everybody can become a publisher at a very low cost of entry &#8211; a mobile with data access &#8211; and most people do not have the grounding in journalistic principles of factual accuracy, sensibility and taste. I think the only viable solution is for the more established Tweeps to influence the Twittersphere to be more discretionary. Everything else &#8211; code of ethics, guidelines etc &#8211; will either fall on deaf ears to the social media masses and therefore &#8211; as you pointed out &#8211; unenforceable. Like your blog BTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

